Joe Gould's Secret by Joseph Mitchell
I read Joe Gould's Secret by Joseph Mitchell ~10/08, I think, alone in my room. It combines two essays published in the New Yorker in 1942/1964. It is about an unemployed homeless person in Manhattan ~5'0" tall, I think, who tells people he is writing a book that is currently ~9,000,000 words. The person is Joe Gould. Joseph Mitchell profiles Joe Gould for the New Yorker and Joe Gould uses the opportunity to talk to Joseph Mitchell ~10 hours/night ~10 nights, becoming very drunk each night, talking "nonstop" about himself while being served free alcohol, due to not having anyone to talk to normally that would listen to him with interest. At one point Joe Gould says he is aware Joseph Mitchell is being forced, in a way, to listen to him, and so he is taking advantage, by talking a lot. At one point I think Joe Gould sort of "pauses" for a moment from talking to ask Joseph Mitchell if he is annoyed at him for talking so much. Joseph Mitchell thinks about being polite, but then says "yes," he is annoyed, despite having chosen him to write a feature article on. Joe Gould seems unaffected and continues talking.
After the profile is published in 1942 (the first part of the book) Joe Gould continues talking to Joseph Mitchell by visiting his New Yorker office and calling him a lot (sort of on the pretext that he has no address and so has to get the letters addressed to him, due to the profile, via Joseph Mitchell via the New Yorker), and Joseph Mitchell becomes very annoyed (this is written about in the second part of the book, in the article published in 1964, after Joe Gould has died) and a little scared, because the more Joe Gould talks to him the more "common information" will exist between them, Joseph Mitchell knows, and the more attached Joe Gould will become to him. Then Joseph Mitchell thinks the only want to "get rid of" Joe Gould is to get a publisher interested in his ~9,000,000-word book. After some research Joseph Mitchell learns that the book doesn't exist.
There are two very emotional scenes. One is when Joseph Mitchell sort of finds out that Joe Gould has been lying about his ~9,000,000 word book. The other (I'm ~95% certain I "cried," to some degree, after reading this) is when Joe Gould, late in one of the ~10-hour talking sessions, drunk, says he thinks often about and has "never forgiven" his mother for something she once "did to him," referring to one time when she sat openly crying in front of him (when he was a small child) while saying something like "my poor son" (Joe Gould had problems as a child, was very small and got sick a lot, and other things). After the 1942 profile is published Joe Gould gets some benefactors for some time, but they eventually "abandon him." He says there are times when he feels that everyone in Manhattan whom he asks for money (his job is to just ask people for money) dislikes him. I don't think he had friends. At some point he is taken to a mental hospital and dies there.
Joseph Mitchell, over a few years, looks at Joe Gould's notebooks at different times (Joe Gould always had notebooks with him that he wrote in daily, writing his ~9,000,000-word "oral history" thing, he tells everyone) and sees that Joe Gould has been rewriting the same 3-4 essays for ~20 years in different notebooks, something like 100 times (and not working on his ~9,000,000-word, because it doesn't exist), with the same structure and details each time, but different "digressions." The same essays Joe Gould rewrote repeatedly, for ~20 years, were about his father's death, his mother's death, and a satire re liking ketchup a lot.
The prose style and tone and focus of the 1942 section are different in the 1964 section. The 1964 section is more detached and concrete, with not many idioms/cliches, and long sentences sometimes. I liked it. The 1964 section is much more "personal" than the 1942 section. The two sections' different tones created, to me, a non-sequitur feeling that seemed emotional/complex in terms of Joseph Mitchell. The book seems emotional both in terms of Joseph Mitchell and Joe Gould. According to Amazon it is 46,624 words. This cover makes it seem something like "a delightful comedy about overcoming shortcomings to find peace and joy in life," which is maybe the opposite of what it's like, in my view.Mitchell's account of Joe Gould's extravagantly disguised case of writer's block, published as Joe Gould's Secret (1964), presaged the last decades of Mitchell's own life. From 1964 until his death in 1996, Mitchell would go to work at his office on a daily basis, but he never published anything significant again. In a remembrance of Mitchell printed in the June 10, 1996, issue of The New Yorker, his colleague Roger Angell wrote: "Each morning, he stepped out of the elevator with a preoccupied air, nodded wordlessly if you were just coming down the hall, and closed himself in his office. He emerged at lunchtime, always wearing his natty brown fedora (in summer, a straw one) and a tan raincoat; an hour and a half later, he reversed the process, again closing the door. Not much typing was heard from within, and people who called on Joe reported that his desktop was empty of everything but paper and pencils. When the end of the day came, he went home. Sometimes, in the evening elevator, I heard him emit a small sigh, but he never complained, never explained."







22 Comments:
i liked reading the review
seems sweet
should've 'unloaded' this to some site maybe
e.e. cummings wrote a poem about joe gould, and i found it on google books..
http://bit.ly/6KXyZl
http://bit.ly/6KXyZl
i have activated the hyper link
i like ee cummings
noah kalina
i feel 'troubled' by this blog post
nice, it's been a minute since you wrote about a depressing book
review made me want to check it out.
i am pretty sure you do not have this problem, at least not to the same degree. i am happy for you.
Is it possible to contract "writer's block" from reading this book?
remember when you used to say 'choad' a lot
@jakob nice
@timothy nice
@abrupt thank you
@anonymous yes
@andrew probably no
@brandon yes
i wish i could read
i thought your "smiling tao lin" profile picture was pretty sweet
and then you changed it to "green-hooded non-smiling tao lin"
you should change it back to "smiling tao lin"
oh, and i liked the review
what's your opinion on this?
So you want to be a writer by Charles Bukowski
if it doesn't come bursting out of you
in spite of everything,
don't do it.
unless it comes unasked out of your
heart and your mind and your mouth
and your gut,
don't do it.
if you have to sit for hours
staring at your computer screen
or hunched over your
typewriter
searching for words,
don't do it.
if you're doing it for money or
fame,
don't do it.
if you're doing it because you want
women in your bed,
don't do it.
if you have to sit there and
rewrite it again and again,
don't do it.
if it's hard work just thinking about doing it,
don't do it.
if you're trying to write like somebody
else,
forget about it.
if you have to wait for it to roar out of
you,
then wait patiently.
if it never does roar out of you,
do something else.
if you first have to read it to your wife
or your girlfriend or your boyfriend
or your parents or to anybody at all,
you're not ready.
don't be like so many writers,
don't be like so many thousands of
people who call themselves writers,
don't be dull and boring and
pretentious, don't be consumed with self-
love.
the libraries of the world have
yawned themselves to
sleep
over your kind.
don't add to that.
don't do it.
unless it comes out of
your soul like a rocket,
unless being still would
drive you to madness or
suicide or murder,
don't do it.
unless the sun inside you is
burning your gut,
don't do it.
when it is truly time,
and if you have been chosen,
it will do it by
itself and it will keep on doing it
until you die or it dies in you.
there is no other way.
and there never was.
seems like that is something that charles bukowski thought or felt at some point for some amount of time
'lol'
seems good
can i borrow it
Breece D'J Pancake
Post a Comment
<< Home